For the Benefit of Those Who Have Not Read Another Blog in The Past Week
Posted by Chris on March 24, 2006 at 11:10 am.
UPDATE: WaPo.com Executive Editor, Jim Brady: He’s outta’ here.
UPDATE II: Domenech’s rebuttal is here; surrebuttals are here, here and here. Point of procedure: What is the term for the reply to a surrebuttal? I may need that for tomorrow.
UPDATE III: Some have suggested that plagiarism was the lesser of the two “ism” charges which might fairly be leveled at the Post’s erstwhile conservative blogger. If this was intended to be funny, I really need to check my satire chip:
UPDATE IV: Gen. JC Christian, patriot, wants to fill Domenech’s shoes. He has my vote.
The Washington Post’s new “conservative blogger” has apparently never written anything which he did not plagiarize.
You can’t make this stuff up. {rimshot}
UPDATE: WaPo.com Executive Editor, Jim Brady: He’s outta’ here.
UPDATE II: Domenech’s rebuttal is here; surrebuttals are here, here and here. Point of procedure: What is the term for the reply to a surrebuttal? I may need that for tomorrow.
UPDATE III: Some have suggested that plagiarism was the lesser of the two “ism” charges which might fairly be leveled at the Post’s erstwhile conservative blogger. If this was intended to be funny, I really need to check my satire chip:
It just happens that killing black babies has the happy result of reducing crime. I do not question the research or logic of Levitt’s argument. If a specifiable group is inordinately responsible for a social problem, it follows that eliminating a large number of people belonging to that group will reduce the problem. It is hard to argue with that.
UPDATE IV: Gen. JC Christian, patriot, wants to fill Domenech’s shoes. He has my vote.
No Responses to “For the Benefit of Those Who Have Not Read Another Blog in The Past Week”
“For the Benefit of Those Who Have Not Read Another Blog in The Past Week” has generated no comments.You may post a comment below.